The ABC Murders
👤| Published | January 1936 |
| Genre | Serial Killer Mystery |
| Publisher | Collins Crime Club |
| Language | English |
| Series | Hercule Poirot #13 |
📝My Honest Review: The ABC Murders
This book feels incredibly modern. Before we had Mindhunter or The Silence of the Lambs, we had the A.B.C. killer. The killer sends Poirot letters announcing where and when the next murder will happen, using the alphabet as a guide: Alice Ascher in Andover, Betty Barnard in Bexhill... it’s a terrifying, systematic game. Poirot captures the vibe perfectly when he says:
"Because the murderer is a madman, he is not necessarily a fool."
Now, as a critic, I have to point out the **weakness of the secondary characters**. To make the "alphabet" trick work, Christie has to jump between different cities and different victims. Because of this, we don't get to spend much time with the suspects. They feel a bit like background noise compared to the hunt for the killer. Also, the middle section where they are just waiting for the letter 'D' can feel a little repetitive.
But the **cleverness of the solution** is 5-star quality. Christie does something here that she is famous for: she hides a very simple, personal motive behind a giant, flashy, complicated screen. If you're a fan of psychological thrillers, this is probably the best Poirot book you can read.
⏱️ 1-Minute Summary (for busy readers)
Hercule Poirot receives anonymous letters signed "A.B.C." that detail upcoming murders. In each case, a victim is killed in a town starting with the next letter of the alphabet, and an A.B.C. Railway Guide is left at the scene. The police hunt for a man named Alexander Bonaparte Cust, a traveling salesman who seems to have been at every crime scene and suffers from blackouts.
The twist? Franklin Clarke is the killer. He wasn't a madman at all. He wanted to kill his brother (Sir Carmichael Clarke, the 'C' victim) to inherit his fortune before the brother’s sick wife died and he remarried. Franklin created the entire "A.B.C." serial killer persona and committed the 'A' and 'B' murders just to make the 'C' murder look like the work of a random lunatic. He set up the innocent Mr. Cust to take the fall for everything.
🔹 The Critic's Report Card
| ⭐ Rating | 4.7 / 5 A brilliant bridge between classic mystery and modern thriller. |
|---|---|
| 👍 What I Loved | The Misdirection. Hiding a specific murder in a crowd of random murders is one of the smartest things Christie ever thought of. |
| 👎 What I Didn’t Like | The lack of depth in the victims. You don't really get to know them, so their deaths don't feel as "personal" as in her other books. |
| 😐 Overrated or Underrated? | Underrated. It’s often overshadowed by Orient Express, but the plot is actually tighter and more logical. |
👤 Human Take: The Invisible Man
The "human" tragedy here is Alexander Bonaparte Cust. He’s a veteran with a head injury, he's socially awkward, and he’s incredibly lonely. He’s the perfect scapegoat because he’s "invisible" to society and he doesn't even trust his own mind. It’s a sad look at how easy it is for a clever predator to ruin the life of a vulnerable person. It makes the final reveal very satisfying because you want to see Mr. Cust saved just as much as you want to see the killer caught.
The Final Word: It’s a high-stakes, intelligent, and very fast-paced read. If you want to see Poirot at the top of his game against a truly arrogant villain, this is the one for you.
Discover Your Next Great Read
Handpicked recommendations from our collection of literary treasures
💬Discussions